How Embedded Finance Will Disrupt Traditional Financial Services Brands
As embedded finance becomes more widely adopted, both traditional financial institutions and fintechs will face existential brand identity decisions. Financial services leaders should explore their options now. This memo comes from the latest State of Consumer Banking and Payments report, available here.
Embedded finance is the type of transaction a consumer conducts without realizing it, or without disrupting their customer experience — for example, paying automatically while exiting an Uber, or purchasing something from a “just walk out” store.
It’s the effective invisibility of embedded financial services that poses the biggest threat to traditional financial institutions and fintechs.
Few Americans have heard of the term (only around 1 in 10), yet nearly a third of U.S. adults have experienced embedded finance through Uber alone.
Consumers encounter embedded payments regularly
Consumers are accustomed to using nonfinancial apps to make payments. Over 40 percent of consumers report using Apple Pay, Google Pay or Shop Pay to make a payment. Nearly a quarter report sending a payment directly through a social media app or using a “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) service — both of which are examples of embedded payments.
But the applications of embedded finance extend beyond payments to permeate every aspect of the financial services industry.
Consumers can expect greater opportunities for embedded credit and lending, as well as insurance and investment, as nonfinancial services companies across industries build or buy the capability to offer these services.
The increased ease of accessing embedded finance will spell trouble for traditional financial services providers.
Big tech is introducing consumers to embedded finance
The more consumers interact with companies without thinking about how their money travels from one place to the next, or without having to go through onerous processes to finance a purchase, the more their interactions with their traditional financial services providers will feel outdated — or worse, they’ll stop interacting with them altogether. This doesn’t just apply to traditional banks and insurance providers, either.
“Fintech” will become a meaningless term because of its ubiquity, and also because of its role as a utility. For businesses, fintech is becoming part of their technology stack, while for consumers, it’s becoming part of their experience with brands. Matt Harris of Bain Capital Ventures has described fintech as the “fourth platform,” predicting that it “will join internet, cloud, and mobile in the modern technology stack.”
In the same way that we don’t think of companies with websites as “internet companies” or those with apps as “mobile companies,” companies with financial services capabilities won’t be labeled “fintechs.” Every company will be a fintech company as a result of the embedded financial services they offer.
Companies with embedded financial services are already showing their scale and brand power. Uber and Google Pay each have higher awareness, favorability and users than the largest bank by consumer deposits, JPMorgan Chase.
Financial services providers have two choices to make
Will they fade into the background as “banking as a service” providers by creating technology that can be seamlessly integrated into the tech stack of non-financial services companies? Or will they double down on providing financial advice through traditional services?
The former means essentially abandoning the B2C component of their branding and focusing more on the B2B vendor relationships they have with companies embedding their services.
The latter would require a reimagining of the role they play in consumers’ lives — beyond providing the utility of accounts to serving the ends to which those accounts are a means.
Consumers naturally want to think about their finances, and financial services providers should be prepared to offer them actionable insights when they do, based on a hyper-detailed understanding of their financial goals and well-being, and to provide tools to help them achieve their aims. In a world where it's easier than ever to spend, financial services providers can play the role of holistic adviser, giving consumers a complete picture of how their finances stack up to their goals.
Fintechs face a third option: becoming a super app
Because of their legacy systems and regulatory hurdles, traditional banks and financial services providers have little hope of developing into super apps — but this lofty goal remains a possibility for nonfinancial platforms.
Super apps by definition must provide more than just financial services. Instead, they allow consumers to conduct nearly any transaction seamlessly from one place.
The quintessential example of a super app is Grab, which, like Uber, started as a ride-hailing app but now offers food delivery, courier service and grocery orders, as well as payment, insurance and investing capabilities. Meanwhile, Klarna falls into the “aspiring super app” category, evolving from its primary focus on BNPL to offer shopping, payment and delivery services.
Charlotte Principato previously worked at Morning Consult as a lead financial services analyst covering trends in the industry.