Tracking the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
Latest surveys conducted Oct. 29-31, 2024, among 8,918 likely voters, with an unweighted margin of error of +/-1 percentage point. Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
Ahead of the 2024 presidential election, Morning Consult is conducting thousands of surveys every day, asking U.S. voters if they plan to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump in November, as well as how they view these candidates and other top political figures. Our ongoing candidate tracking is complemented by daily tracking of the issues voters consider most important when making their decisions at the ballot box, whom they trust most to handle those issues and the extent to which media coverage of those issues is reaching them.
Every week, we’ll update this page with the latest tracking data on all of the major questions heading into the 2024 general election. For our latest state-level tracking of the race, as well as key Senate and gubernatorial contests, see here.
Sign up for the latest political news and analysis delivered to your inbox every morning.
Key Takeaways
Harris leads Trump in our final national survey: Harris leads Trump by 2 percentage points among likely voters, 49% to 47%, down from a 3-point lead in our previous update. Taking into account the survey’s margin of sampling error of 1 percentage point, the candidates could be tied at 48%, or she could be up by 4 points, 50% to 46%.
Harris garners better coverage ahead of final week: The bulk of likely voters (45%) said they have recently heard something positive about Harris, maintaining the positive buzz advantage she’s held throughout the campaign as it reaches its final weeks. Meanwhile, the bulk of the expected electorate (49%) reported recently hearing something negative about Trump.
Republicans maintain trust edge on immigration: Similar to the run-up to the 2022 midterms, Republicans are more favored than Democrats to handle the economy, national security, crime and especially immigration. Democrats maintain their trust advantages on health care, entitlement programs, climate change and abortion.
Data Downloads
Morning Consult Pro+ subscribers are able to access the data sets that power Morning Consult Pro's reports and analysis. Learn more and get access.
Tracking 2024 Presidential Vote Choice Over Time
Data points reflect a three-day moving average of surveys conducted among at least 4,000 registered U.S. voters, with unweighted margins of +/-1 to 2 percentage points. Data points prior to Sep. 4 show results among registered voters, while those on and after that date reflect likely voters.
- Harris began her campaign with more support than Biden ever received from the national electorate this cycle.
- Harris’ entry into the race reduced the appetite for a protest vote: Fewer voters became uncertain about their vote or planned to opt for someone else with her on the ballot.
- Likely voters are even less likely than registered voters to be unsure of how they'll vote or to say they'll back a third-party option.
Tracking Politicians' Popularity
Latest survey conducted Oct. 25-27, 2024, among 2,205 likely U.S. voters, with an unweighted margin of error of +/-2 percentage points. Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Net favorability is the share of potential voters with favorable views minus the share with unfavorable views.
- Before she ascended to the top of the ticket, sentiment about Harris had tracked closely with views about Biden. But since securing presumptive status as the Democratic presidential nominee, Harris has become significantly more popular than Biden, Trump and her party’s brand on Capitol Hill.
- For most of this election cycle, Democrats in Congress have managed to maintain a consistent edge in popularity over their Republican counterparts.
Tracking the Buzz About Politicians
Latest survey conducted Oct. 25-27, 2024, among 2,205 likely U.S. voters, with an unweighted margin of error of +/-2 percentage points. Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Net buzz is the share of voters who heard something positive minus the share who heard something negative.
- The kind of information voters heard about Harris previously tracked with what they were hearing about Biden, but it’s been a different story since she became the Democratic nominee: Her net buzz rating now exceeds Trump’s and Biden’s by double digits.
- Voters have been more likely to say they’re hearing good things about Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz than Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance.
- Fewer voters said they’ve heard about members of Congress, though once again, it’s the GOP that tends to generate more negative coverage.
- The tenor of coverage about Biden has improved drastically since he announced his decision on July 21 not to seek re-election this year.
Tracking 2024’s Top Issues
Latest survey conducted Oct. 25-27, 2024, among 2,205 likely U.S. voters, with an unweighted margin of error of +/-2 percentage points.
- The issue portfolio for the November elections largely echoes that of the 2022 midterms. The economy is voters’ top issue and hot-button topics such as crime and abortion occupy similar places in voters’ minds. But it’s a different story with regard to immigration. Roughly 7 in 10 voters now say it’s “very important” to their vote in November, compared with 50% who said it was very important to their vote in November 2022.
Tracking the Buzz About 2024's Top Issues
Latest survey conducted Oct. 25-27, 2024, among 2,205 likely U.S. voters, with an unweighted margin of error of +/-2 percentage points. Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Net buzz is the share of voters who heard something positive minus the share who heard something negative.
- The tenor of media coverage about the economy, jobs, and crime have improved, albeit unevenly, over the course of this election cycle.
- Meanwhile, the tone of coverage about immigration has remained overwhelmingly negative.
Congressional Trust on Handling of 2024's Top Issues
Latest survey conducted Oct. 25-27, 2024, among 2,205 likely U.S. voters, with an unweighted margin of error of +/-2 percentage points. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
Source of This Data
Methodology
The latest national results on the general-election matchup of Vice President Kamala Harris and Donald Trump reflect surveys conducted Oct. 29-31, 2024, among 8,918 likely U.S. voters, with an unweighted margin of error of +/-1 percentage point. Results from surveys that concluded prior to Sept. 4, 2024, are among registered U.S. voters — not likely voters.
Results do not include responses among voters who were initially undecided and were asked to pick which candidate they are leaning toward. Our likely voter criteria includes any registered voters who say they are highly likely to vote in the November 2024 general election. The scale of our likely voter filter question ranges from 1-10, where “1” means an individual will definitely not vote in the November 2024 presidential election and “10” means an individual will definitely vote in November. Respondents who answer that they are an “8” or higher are deemed likely voters.
Morning Consult’s latest reported results on questions pertaining to candidate favorability and buzz, issue prioritization and buzz, and congressional issue trust reflect data gathered on a weekly basis among roughly 2,000 likely U.S. voters, with an unweighted margin of error of +/-2 percentage points. Results from weekly surveys that concluded prior to Sept. 1, 2024, are among registered voters — not likely voters. For more information on our 2024 methodology, see here.
About Morning Consult
Morning Consult is a global decision intelligence company changing how modern leaders make smarter, faster, better decisions. The company pairs its proprietary high-frequency data with applied artificial intelligence to better inform decisions on what people think and how they will act. Learn more at morningconsult.com.
Cameron Easley is Morning Consult’s head of U.S. Political Analysis. He has led Morning Consult's coverage of U.S. politics and elections since 2016, and his work has appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Politico, Axios, FiveThirtyEight and on Fox News, CNN and MSNBC. Cameron joined Morning Consult from Roll Call, where he was managing editor. He graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Follow him on Twitter @cameron_easley. Interested in connecting with Cameron to discuss his analysis or for a media engagement or speaking opportunity? Email [email protected].
Eli Yokley is Morning Consult’s U.S. politics analyst. Eli joined Morning Consult in 2016 from Roll Call, where he reported on House and Senate campaigns after five years of covering state-level politics in the Show Me State while studying at the University of Missouri in Columbia, including contributions to The New York Times, Politico and The Daily Beast. Follow him on Twitter @eyokley. Interested in connecting with Eli to discuss his analysis or for a media engagement or speaking opportunity? Email [email protected].
