U.S. Foreign Policy Tracker
Morning Consult’s U.S. Foreign Policy Tracker and companion indexes assess Americans’ views of the trajectory of U.S. foreign policy, including their top foreign policy concerns, whether public opinion skews toward isolationism or engagement, and whether Americans favor multilateral or unilateral solutions to global economic and military challenges. A methodological companion memo can be found here.
For U.S. and global multinationals, the tracker is intended to help government affairs, public policy, and risk management teams better understand the depth of Americans’ concerns about bilateral relations and their views on key policy issues in order to inform data-driven scenario planning and policy advocacy. For U.S. and global asset managers, the tracker is intended to provide data-driven inputs into investment strategies and facilitate more accurate pricing of risks arising from U.S. foreign policy.
The tracker updates quarterly. The latest data is from August 2025.
Key Takeaways
Republicans' most pressing foreign policy concerns — led by terrorism, immigration and drug trafficking — continue to skew inward, while Democrats' priorities have an increasingly outward orientation, marked by concerns about human rights and global economic conditions. Geopolitical tensions involving Israel and Russia continue to rank near the bottom of voters' priorities just ahead of a global push to recognize Palestinian statehood in the fall and President Trump's push to end the war in Ukraine.
As the wars in Gaza and Ukraine drag into their third and fourth years, respectively, voters' enthusiasm for greater U.S. engagement in global affairs (as opposed to isolationism) remains at or near tracking highs across the partisan divide. While U.S. voters (including Republicans) broadly prefer isolationism, the trend suggests the public may perceive greater U.S. efforts to resolve key geopolitical issues over the near-term as the most efficient pathway to securing greater U.S. isolationism over the long-term (i.e. resolving existing conflicts to which Washington is already a party while avoiding new ones will facilitate greater U.S. isolationism overall going forward).
Despite American voters’ penchant for isolationism, voters of all political stripes consistently prefer addressing foreign policy matters multilaterally when the United States does get involved, as opposed to going it alone. The trend suggests the Trump administration's recent willingness to allow for a European voice in resolving the war in Ukraine will be well-received in most quarters.
On tariffs, we continue to note a pronounced divide in sentiment among Democrats and Republicans, with the former preferring to decrease tariffs on foreign goods and the latter preferring to increase them. This finding is consistent with those presented in the latest update of our U.S. tariff sentiment tracker, which finds that Republicans continue to approve of them and see net positive benefits for both their household finances and the U.S. economy.
Data Downloads
Morning Consult Pro+ subscribers are able to access the data sets that power our reports and analysis. Learn more and get access.
Foreign Policy Priorities
Americans' top foreign policy priorities
Isolationism and Engagement
Morning Consult's Indexes of U.S. Isolationism and Engagement report the average shares of Americans who favor greater isolationism, stability or engagement in U.S. foreign policy across three thematic issue areas, including (1) soft power and foreign aid, covering attitudes toward involvement in other countries’ affairs and foreign aid provision; (2) overseas military engagement, covering support for U.S. troop deployments and involvement in military conflicts; and (3) trade and investment policies, covering preferences toward tariffs on foreign goods and barriers to inward foreign investment. Each index is computed as a simple average of shares corresponding to index response levels (isolationism, stability, and engagement) across all six component data series.
Morning Consult Indexes of Isolationism and Engagement
Component Series
The charts below provide our latest readings on American sentiment for key component series of the above indexes, including public preferences surrounding (1) U.S. involvement in other countries' affairs, (2) overseas troop deployments, and (3) trade and tariffs.
Involvement in other countries’ affairs
Overseas troop deployments
Trade and tariffs
Multilateralism and Unilateralism
Morning Consult's Indexes of U.S. Multilateralism and Unilateralism report the average shares of Americans who favor greater multilateralism, stability or unilateralism in U.S. foreign policy across three thematic issue areas, including (1) military policy coordination, covering attitudes toward addressing global military disputes in coordination with U.S. partners and allies as opposed to going it alone; (2) economic policy coordination, covering the same attitudes in the context of global economic disputes; and (3) policy coordination via diplomatic forums, covering attitudes toward U.S. involvement in international organizations. Each index is computed as a simple average of shares corresponding to index response levels (multilateralism, stability, and unilateralism) across all three component data series.
Morning Consult Indexes of Multilateralism and Unilateralism
Component Series
The charts below provide our latest readings on American sentiment for all component series of the above indexes, including public preferences surrounding (1) the resolution of military disputes, (2) the resolution of economic disputes, and (3) and U.S. involvement in international organizations.
Resolution of military disputes
Resolution of economic disputes
Involvement in international organizations
Companion Research & Analysis
- Morning Consult’s U.S. Foreign Policy Sentiment Indexes Methodology Primer: A companion methodology primer for the indices featured in this tracker.
- Counter/Consensus Email Briefing: Morning Consult Counter/Consensus newsletter is a biweekly, publicly available briefing that provides pithy, empirically-grounded forecasts derived from our political data assets, and frequently touches on key issues in U.S. foreign policy.
Companion Data Assets for Pro+ Subscribers
- Trended Data: Trended data for all data series featured in this tracker among select demographics is available for Morning Consult Pro+ subscribers via the “Data Downloads” section of this page. See “Commercial Data Access” below for additional details on access to demographic data beyond that presented in this tracker and companion data file.
Supplementary Commercial Data Access
All data featured in this tracker derives from a tracking survey fielded in the United States from July 2022 onwards, with broader demographic coverage available for enterprise or public sector use. Contact us with inquiries regarding commercial access.
Methodology
Data featured in this tracker derives from surveys conducted among representative samples of roughly 2,000 U.S. voters, each with an unweighted margin of error or +/-2 percentage points. The survey began fielding in July 2022.
All data was collected through Morning Consult’s proprietary survey research capabilities. All interviews are conducted online. Data is weighted to approximate representative samples of U.S. voters.
Consult our Global Political Intelligence Methodology Primer for additional details on sampling and data collection procedures, weighting and representativeness, margins of error, and question wording for our broader Political Intelligence data product.
About Morning Consult
Morning Consult is a global decision intelligence company changing how modern leaders make smarter, faster, better decisions. The company pairs its proprietary high-frequency data with applied artificial intelligence to better inform decisions on what people think and how they will act. Learn more at morningconsult.com.
Email [email protected] to speak with a member of the Morning Consult team.
Jason I. McMann leads geopolitical risk analysis at Morning Consult. He leverages the company’s high-frequency survey data to advise clients on how to integrate geopolitical risk into their decision-making. Jason previously served as head of analytics at GeoQuant (now part of Fitch Solutions). He holds a Ph.D. from Princeton University’s Politics Department. Follow him on Twitter @jimcmann. Interested in connecting with Jason to discuss his analysis or for a media engagement or speaking opportunity? Email [email protected].
